The Removal of Calculus from Ontario High Schools
(Some quick comments: At the time of the writing, the Ontario Ministry of Education has deferred the decision to change the curriculum until 2007, but the facts remain and still hold true.)
For those who are unfamiliar with Calculus, it is a small strand of mathematics that essentially studies the rates of change of variables, but is often extended to include broader concepts such as functions and relations and equations on the Cartesian plane. Its ideas have been around since the ancient Greeks, but were not formalized in the 17th century by Newton and Leibniz. It has been used since the 17th century by various fields of science and mathematics to solve difficult problems and develop new concepts.
Early in the 2005-2006 school year, the Ontario Ministry of Education held a review of the secondary school curriculum in Ontario, particularly in the mathematics area. Among the most notable changes was the removal, or indeed, substantial reduction, of calculus from the grade 12 curriculum. The primary reasons given for the sweeping changes in the grade 12 math program were that dropout rates were increasing, enrollment into certain mathematics courses (particularly the infamous Geometry and Discrete Mathematics) were decreasing, and rates of failure in grade 12 Calculus were increasing. The proposals also noted that there was 'not enough time' to teach Calculus in a 4-year high school system, and that the subject was only necessary for careers in engineering, science, political science or physics. These proposals not only do not make any sense for the advancement of education, but will also hinder the future of Ontario's workforce.
First, the allegation that Calculus is too difficult a course for high school students is ridiculous. Calculus has been around at the high school level for several decades. Ask your parents, and they have probably sat through a Calculus class, or at the very least, had the option of doing so during their high school years. Calculus is also offered worldwide in high school, and in almost every other province in Canada. So what has changed in the last few years in Ontario that has caused an increase in the failure rate of Calculus students? Well, to answer that question, we will not look at the Calculus course, but at the foundations of mathematical education in Ontario. In Ontario, mathematics is often unfairly treated as an extraneous subject that is 'feared' by students. This attitude of education has caused a dramatic lag on the teaching of mathematical concepts in early education. Simple concepts of counting, addition, and subtraction are often left out in kindergarten and are sometimes taught as late as the second grade, usually out of fear from the teachers that students will find the subject "too difficult" for them. In turn, there is a cascading effect on the rest of the student's life in school. By the time students reach the sixth grade, they have learned only the bare basics of mathematics, but have developed a culture of fear around the subject. Back to Calculus, the subject itself requires a few mathematical concepts to have been learned by the student. They include an understanding of equations, functions, the Cartesian plane, and the ability to manipulate algebraic expressions. These skills are not very difficult to master, and generally do not require much conceptualization on the part of the student once it has been taught. Therefore, it is not much of a stretch to say that these concepts should have been taught from grades 9 through 11. Unfortunately, because of the culture of fear of mathematics and the delay of its teaching, students are still learning about fractions and division in grades 9 and 10. Thus, it is easy to see how students are going into Calculus without the necessary skills, and will naturally find the subject difficult. Calculus teachers are left with no other choice but to reteach these concepts and skills, thus leaving no time for the actual "calculus" part of the course. The fault in the system here is that mathematics is being dragged along the curriculum too slowly at the elementary level, leaving students wholly unprepared for the real world of math by the time they reach high school. Therein lies the biggest problem in the approach to this problem by the Ministry of Education - instead of starting at the root of the problem, they are only attacking the symptom, and the fatal flaw remains. Indeed, a change from the bottom up would take some time and considerable effort, but with the advancement of the modern world, it is inevitable that changes will happen, and if the current trend continues, Ontario's education system will lag far behind the rest of the world, and schools will not be prepared for the future.
Recently, Calculus has been used as a convenient excuse for students dropping out of school, due to its irrelevance to the students and its level of difficulty. This is no more convincing than the student's popular "I left my homework at home" excuse. It may be true that dropout rates are increasing in high school, but this fact is completely independent of students taking the Calculus course. In Ontario, Calculus is only offered as a '12U' course, meaning it is geared towards more hard-working, intelligent students aiming towards post-secondary education in university. In any graduating class, the number of students heading towards university and college are about the same (although the trend is leaning towards the university side of things due to parental and educational pressure). The system is designed in such a way (like it or not) that only the more academically inclined half of students from grades 9 and 10 move on to grade 11 and 12 'U' level courses. Generally, students who drop out of high school are failing courses, and by the same token, if a student has bad grades during their first two years of high school, they are strongly encouraged against or even prevented from taking 'U' level courses in the senior years. Thus, although it is more difficult to prove statically due to the lack of information at this level, it is probable that of the students who drop out, only a very low percentage have taken Calculus, and were not influenced by the subject. The reasons behind the dropout of students vary, but they will not be discussed in the space of this text.
The extent of use of Calculus in various fields has been debated by the Ministry of Education and their study, and they have come up with only a short list of careers that require the study of the strand of math. Those include engineering, science, political science, and physics. As a Calculus student, I find that list highly selective and is a gross misinterpretation of the flexibility of Calculus. In fact, many concepts and skills learned in Calculus are essential to business, medicine, and even certain arts, like architecture. Those who believe otherwise do not understand the essential concepts behind Calculus and do not realize its power. It is inconceivable that students will enter university programs without learning any calculus, even though it is an integral part of modern science. Where I will concede to changes in the curriculum is in its focus, but I will propose an alternate method of changing grade 12 math. Currently, Calculus is the focus of the grade 12 mathematics curriculum, and the main mathematics courses in grades 9 through 11 all gear students toward grade 12 Calculus. Although Calculus is very powerful and can be used for a great many purposes, it should still remain an optional course reserved for students who are interested in the subject, or have a need for it in the career path they choose (particularly for computing, engineering, physics, and mathematical studies). In place of Calculus, a fourth grade 12 university level mathematics course should be implemented. This course would include in it the concepts of algebra, equations, graphical analysis, and more real-world applications of mathematics, which could mean a movement of the current grade 11 finance unit into this new grade 12 course. Other changes to grade 12 math could potentially include the removal of the last unit of Geometry and Discrete, as it overlaps with the Data Management course and is often not taught, and the movement of Conic Sections into the grade 12 Geometry & Discrete course. These changes would allow teachers in grade 11 to focus on the development of vital mathematical skills required for all of the grade 12 math courses, and allow more time in earlier grades to cover geometric and algebraic concepts that have been neglected in the current curriculum (these include Euclidean Geometry and trigonometry). The choice of four different grade 12 mathematics courses for university-bound students with the new focus on the algebra skills course would make much more sense than cramming many unrelated concepts into the Advanced Functions and Introductory Calculus course as it is being done currently, and would leave Calculus as the third or fourth math course behind the new proposed Algebra course and the current Data Management course, the latter of which has had a reputation of being the 'easiest' of the three current senior math courses, and is often taken by students in grade 11. The Calculus course and the Geometry & Discrete course would thus be left only for stronger math students and those who are motivated for a challenge. This solution allows more flexibility and choices for the average student, while both reducing the focus on Calculus as well as keeping the course available for students who require it.
Moving forward, it is important for Ontario's Ministry of Education to realize that removing Calculus from the curriculum will not solve the problems they have identified themselves. The problem should be attacked at its root, that is, the culture of fear that has developed around mathematics, even with its simplest concepts and skills, especially in early education. Without a solid foundation of the concepts behind math, it is inevitable that students will find Calculus and its related subjects hard to understand. The focus of Calculus in the grade 12 curriculum should be reduced, and deferred to a new course which will encompass and bring to a closure all the algebraic skills that will be useful in practically every career path. Calculus should be kept as a third or fourth senior mathematics course, for students who still need it for their post-secondary education or have strong interest in the subject.
February 26th, 2006 - 00:34
I agree that the problem should be addressed at the roots. Additionally there are some other problems that must be recognized.
To agree with you, I believe that to solve the problem with the difficulty of the grade 12 math does not lie in the difficulty of the material, but rather the time that has been wasted at the elementary level. I don’t believe there is a general and widespread fear of mathematics, as most people I speak to about elementary often say that Math was their “best” subject. However, they, like myself, found it to be extremely different once they have come to high school. This has caused the problem that students were not accustomed to the fact that in order to be a good mathematics student, they must practice the math being taught (in other words: doing their homework). However, in the past, namely in elementary and including grade 9 and 10, most students had gotten away with never doing their homework, never listening in class and getting a respectable, if not commendable mark.
Currently there are other options for grade 12 mathematics, it lies at the college level. But because it has the college tag applied to it, students that do not need mathematics in University for the program of their choice do not take it. Instead they leave mathematics behind and move onto University.
On another problem, I believe that the tags we have put onto the courses should simply be removed. As a society, we have put the word “University” on a high pedestal. It is now a common belief that if you do not go to “Univeristy” you are a failure at life. You are told to go to University so that you will get a good University, allowing you to get a good job and a good salary. The current way the school system is built, that is the message that is sent. No one ever aspires to do anything with their hands anymore (by doing something with their hands, I mean trades: carpentry for example). Look at the glory of RHHS. The school is the new generation of purely academic pursuit. We don’t have a shop and all 2000 of our students do not know how to use a hand drill. In fact do not even know that there are better tools to use than a cordless drill to drill a hole in a small piece of plastic with (to recognize this, you don’t have to go far, look at the physics projects being produced – or even computer engineering final projects – they’re hidious). Instead of doing things with their hands, the current school system has condemmed some courses from being taken because they do not carry the glorious “University” tag on the end of it. Instead, when the student chooses courses for nest year, they do not choose courses that they are interesting in, rather they choose 6 courses with the Universty tag attached to it, because it would be shameful to take an “M” course for personal interest.
on a side note, i owe you lunch because of our bet =P
February 26th, 2006 - 22:28
hahaha, to agree with brendan, i remember being good at math.. oh boy oh boy, look at me now. NIGHT-effing-SCHOOL.
i don’t fear calculus, really. [okay, maybe i fear trig derivatives but that's because i like to complain] and i -know- it’s not difficult.. so why am i mingling with the old geezers and the potheads? because i’m damned lazy, that’s why.
the problem should be addressed at the roots– by re-implementing the ancient chinese art of .punishment. make the students fear: not math, but the math teachers. if mr wang had whipped me, perhaps i might have done my homework.
our government is crappy, but our crappy population put it in power. i blame myself for being lazy, not the government for instilling a fear of math. Our socialist education system spawns such ungratefulness for education, but at least the opportunity to learn is -there-. oh, if only i were more chinese.. i ought to have been beaten as a child.
even as i ramble nonsensically onwards right this instant, i ought to be doing my calculus homework. or possibly studying for my IB test.
actually. ..no. i was about to wander off on another tangent. but i think i’ll go study instead. this makes no sense. sorry. ap english, baby..
February 27th, 2006 - 18:34
I finally discovered that, pressing the “other” button, you don’t have to sign in.
Anyway, there have been times when I’ve wondered why it is that I don’t find calculus particularly difficult, why I don’t “fear” 12U Calc as much as the vast majority of other grade 12s do. Is it all in the mind – pulling a Descartes: “I think, therefore I am?” Perhaps Calc actually is a difficult subject to master, and so it should indeed be taken out. I might think the latter – that somehow God has instilled the gift of math to a select few – but then I take a look at the rest of the world, where calculus is an integral (haha) part of high school curricula. So then, is it that Ontario kids are just dumber than all the other kids? Unlikely.
I could also say that the entire jk-12 Ontario curriculum de-emphasizes math from jk-10, then bombards us with material in 11-12. To some extent, that was my experience. But I couldn’t logically conclude this for every student, seeing as my jk-4 curriculum was an “old” version, and since I’ve entered high school, the jk-8 curriculum has revamped itself again (though admittedly only to a small degree). In fact, looking back at my math classes, they’ve all been accelerated in one form or another, and I’ve therefore never encountered a serious problem in terms of failing a math course. Hmm. And math has always been the subject of most importance in my family; I’m a born and raised girl math geek (without stepping foot in Kumon!). Alas, only the truly lucky (or truly damned, your choise) are like this. So then, what causes so many kids to fail/drop calculus? This topic is worthy of an anthropologist’s research, because honestly, (heh – after all that wordiness) I don’t know.
March 1st, 2006 - 00:51
You’re definitely right about poor elementary school mathematic education.
Grade 3 is when we first learned our multiplication table. I, being the foolish kid, decided I’d avoid learning this crazy table of numbers. And from that stupid choice, I was lagging behind everyone else in the future years of elementary school, resulting in a 45-55 in grade 8 math.
Now how is this related? I managed to enter high school absolutely fearing my grade 9 mathematics class, worried that I’d do horribly and essentially fail. Turns out I managed to get somewhere around 85, and in grade 10 and 11 I would be around the class average. Now I’m going to admit my mathetmatic skills are still quite poor, however the fact that I was able to catch up to the average joe, without knowing fundemental concepts from elementary school… shows how redundant our elementary school education is.
Brendan, essentially I’m saying that even doing well/bad in elementary school essentially means nothing. Your idea holds true to grade 9 and 10, however elementary school habits really make no difference. You can catch up in grade 9.
Back to your article, in paragraph 4, I think you might have made a bit of misinterpretation with the ministry believing that “Calculus is the reason for overall dropout rates”. I think what they meant was the dropout rates specifically for those courses are high (since they do have statistics on that).
The idea of calculus not being essential for certain fields of study, does still have merit. You have a good idea going on about there being a separate 12 mathetmatics course, and a separate calculus course as an option. Personally, I will be needing my calculus for my field of study in Architecture at Carleton (they take a civil engineering 1st year course), but when I think about how my sister was forced to take calculus for her program at U of T (happens to be Architecture too, just very different program) where absolutely nowhere does her calculus show up. It’s redundant for her to take calc, and I wouldn’t be suprised if she dropped the course if it were ever to be taken off as a requirement for her program.
Calculus is not that bad, but to the average monkey who just needs it strictly as a requirement for application (not a requirement for actually furthering education in university) it is a hell. You don’t see the kid wanting to go into Fine Arts taking AP Physics, why should we be getting students who wont use this advanced Calculus knowledge ever in their future to be taking this course just for “requirement” sake? No, this course is not for everyone. But we can’t simply remove it from the system just because people are complaining about its difficulty. Calculus does have it’s value.
We can’t judge in binary. It’s not simply “calculus is too hard, thus rid calculus”. These little issues that come up like calculus being too difficult for students who dont need it, there should be alternatives. In a chess tournament with categories like beginner and advanced, we can’t rid “advanced” just because the intermediate kids cant handle it. Why not make an “intermediate” category?
April 4th, 2007 - 23:44
however quitting doesnt solve the problem. learning calculus is a life skill (the actual learning part).
August 22nd, 2009 - 20:18
The message of “university first” was prevalent in my OAC years. I took OAC calculus because my Economics program at universtiy required me to take it. I got a 77 in the class.
I also think the message the current provinicial gov’t of “not marking” for lateness, can’t give kids a zero etc. is pure garbage. I find today’s kids are lazy, selfish and a sense of entitlement is a right.
I really wish the think-tanks would go back to a more structured educational component. Reading, writing, math, science and phys.ed should be MANDATORY.