Why I chose Engineering

(Ed note: This post receives a lot of Google hits. For those stumbling upon this post, I also recommend this one, which is more in-depth and updated.)

Yesterday, amidst a rather empty convocation hall, I attended the Engineering Science overture lecture for the 2007 Winter Term, themed “Systems and States”. Giving the lecture was one Professor Thomas Homer-Dixon. The director of the Peace and Conflict Studies Program, and an MIT graduate, Mr. Homer-Dixon’s lecture for the day had a sobering message. By all scientific accounts, modern human civilization is heading towards collapse in many different directions. The time to act against it is now. Yes, climate change is occurring. Yes, population growth is at an unprecedented high. Yes, energy production is slowing down. There are numerous factual evidences that support these phenomena. It’s happening. Now.

Not too long ago, I was contemplating what I would do after high school. For me, there was almost no doubt I was going to be doing something science-related. Being practical, I chose to study engineering rather than purely theoretical science. I wanted to do something with knowledge. Learning is exhilerating, but alone, it serves no greater purpose.

Something else had always been troubling me for a while. Why aren’t the smartest people in the world making the decisions about the world?

Our world, for the large part, is run by the great democratic political machines of industrialized western nations. Yet this same political machine regularly fails at recognizing what I feel are the most important issues of today – the human impact to environment.

Now, I’ve never called myself a tree-hugger, or anything of the sort. I don’t have that sense of activism. But, I do maintain that many governments of today seem only to be concerned, with great hubris, about their own infinite ‘economic’ growth.

I am fascinated by politics. I read the newspaper regularly, just to catch up on the latest political scoop. I am fascinated, by the way politicians continue to sidestep real and important issues, with great deftness of words. Politics, to me, is nothing more than a play on words with some basic economic management.

So I figured long ago, that democracy is broken. Sure, if you ask me now, I’ll tell you that I’ll go out to vote, but for me, the impact of government is too slow, and too little. There are things going wrong with the world today, and political manuevering is not the way to solve it.

I was shocked, one day, about a year ago, to learn that there were still a great many important international figures who contest the notion of global warming, or even climate change. (Here’s a list of some: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Climate_change_sceptics) It shouldn’t take so much work to convince the public. And it sure as hell shouldn’t be so hard to realize how it’s bad for the Earth.

With my faith in politics and the media shaken, I resorted to the conclusion that the only way to get things done is to do things yourself. Of course, it’s a long road, and it’s hard to see where to begin on something so monumental.

Professor Homer-Dixon listed the problems, and offered a great many solutions. He articulated what I had been thinking, unconsciously and in abstract. But now I see it more clearly.

As an engineer, in the 21st century, these problems will be up to us to solve. So we can avoid a catastrophe in the future (near or far). Will we be able to engineer ourselves out of this problem? Well, we can only try and see now.

Comments (3)

  1. Val wrote::

    “I wanted to do something with knowledge. Learning is exhilerating, but alone, it serves no greater purpose.”
    Ahem, I take Physics 189, and although I didn’t quite enjoy talking about “social issues” in the beginning, the ‘engineering’, practical side of physics is evident. woo, go pure sciences =)

    Your optimism is astounding. Politics cannot be overcome by simple making-the-world better attitude. Politics is about power and money, and environmental problems just aren’t immediate enough. And in any case, humanity won’t last for eternity, so why try to make the future better when the present can be enjoyed ‘more fully’?

    That’s not my entire opinion, and I reserve the right the change and alter it, which I do daily =)

    Your optimism is astounding, and thank god we have people in engineering who are there, not for the ‘prize’ of prestige, but for the grand prize of saving us =) woo

    Monday, January 29, 2007 at 10:52 pm #
  2. engineering is cool……..especially astrospaceXD

    Sunday, February 25, 2007 at 12:53 pm #
  3. Anonymous wrote::

    Hello, Your site is great. Regards, Valintino Guxxi

    Saturday, June 30, 2007 at 2:10 am #